September 24, 2008

Johan Galtung and Daisaku Ikeda, "Choose Peace"

"The work for peace needs not not merely a handful of governments or peoples at the top, but all of us."
-Johan Galtung


"All peoples must come to realize and assimilate within themselves the idea of the supreme importance of human life."
-Daisaku Ikeda


"Choose Peace" is dialogue between Daisaku Ikeda, the president of Soka Gakkai International, and Johan Galtung, founder of the International Peace Research Institute. The book, like a long conversation, winds its way through a myriad of topics involving institutions, people, and personal experiences from a transdisciplinary perspective. One of the strong points of this work is that while they are discussing a rather lofty subject, both participants provide very specific solutions to their seemingly utopian vision, such as the restructuring of the United Nations, the reorganization of human settlements into smaller populations, and focusing education toward a curriculum of peace. Although the book is dizzying at times in its breadth, its central theme, peace as work for individuals and societies, never sends the audience adrift. As Galtung states in summing up the book, "The answer is dialoge, inner and outer, among all parties concerned."

Citation Information:
Galtung, J. & Ikeda, D. (1995). Choose peace: A dialogue between Johan Galtung and Daisaku Ikeda. Chicago, IL: Pluto Press.

Links:
TRANSCEND International
International Peace Research Institute, Oslo
Soka Gakkai International

See Also:
Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.


Ikeda, D. (2001). For the sake of peace: Seven paths to global harmony, a Buddhist perspective. Santa Monica, CA: Middleway Press.


International Peace Research Institute. (1964). Journal of peace research. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.

September 16, 2008

Thich Nhat Hanh, “Being Peace”

"Peace work means, first of all, being peace."

"Being Peace" is a simple and approachable work with profound implications for living a peaceful, engaged, and compassionate existence. Thich Nhat Hanh begins with the proposition that “if we are peaceful, if we are happy, we can smile and blossom like a flower, and everyone in our family, our entire society will benefit from our peace.” Through the sharing stories, poems, guidelines and deep insights, he exposes a path to individual peace through the practice of meditation and living mindfully in each moment. One only has to look to Thich Nhat Hanh’s own life to see a shining example of the right livelihood of which he speaks. By the end of the book, the reader can’t help but be inspired. Regardless of all of the external woes of the world and our own internal struggle for happiness, peace can begin with us in the present moment.

Citation Information:
Nhat Hanh, T. & Kotler, A. (2005). Being Peace. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press.

Links:
Plum Village Practice Center
Deer Park Monastery
The Mindfulness Bell Journal

See Also:
Nhat Hanh, T. Kotler, A., & Oda, M. (1992). Touching peace: Practicing the art of mindful living. Berkeley, Calif: Parallax Press.

Nhat Hanh, T. (1993). Love in action: Writings on nonviolent social change. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press.

September 15, 2008

Mahatma Gandhi, "All Men Are Brothers"

"Love is the strongest force the world possesses and yet it is the humblest imaginable."

Originally published by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), "All Men Are Brothers" is a compilation of Gandhi's writings that attempt to illuminate his lifelong experiment in seeking out truth and practicing it through nonviolence (or more specifically, ahimsa. The book contains Gandhi's autobiographical accounts and views regarding various temporal topics, all of which come under the auspices of Ghandi's philosophy and acts of ahimsa. One of the major strengths of this particular compilation is that it does not delve too deeply, providing an unfamiliar reader with a brief and broad foundation into Ghandi's life. What becomes clear from reading his excerpts and quotes is that Gandhi’s life was his message. Through discipline and faith in ahimsa, Gandhi was able to actively oppose oppressive forces while at the same time loving the humanity of the actors behind the oppression. Although much of his work was aimed at nonviolent resistance, his lifelong experiment in practicing ahimsa was also a constructive force for the loving community that he hoped one day to help build. "All Men Are Brothers" provides a brief glimpse into the life of an extraordinary man and acts as a call to action for those seeking community built on a foundation of love, truth, and nonviolence.

Citation Information:
Gandhi, M. K. (2005). All men are brothers: Life and thoughts of Mahatma Gandhi. New York: Continuum.

Links:
Complete Information on Gandhi
Tolstoy Farm

See Also:
Gandhi, M. K. (1957). An autobiography; The story of my experiments with truth. Boston: Beacon Press.

Gandhi, M. K. (1958). Collected works. Delhi: Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India.

September 6, 2008

Margaret Mead, "And Keep Your Powder Dry"

"Only by taking out the beam from our own eye, and the mote from our neighbor's, both at once, can we hope to get anywhere."

By taking pause from anthropological work abroad to write "And Keep your Powder Dry," Margaret Mead answered a call to duty for which she felt obliged to her home country during World War II. To this end, Mead turns her focus and expertise as an anthropologist on the U.S., taking inventory of its human capital to determine what her country would need to fight and win the war. From this description, it would seem that she approaches the topic of peace as an end for which war is the means, but that is not necessarily the case. Rather, this book is used by Mead to seek an outcome for a world already entrenched in war, and to propose to her audience a globally peaceful future thereafter. She turns an eye trained in Anthropology yet tinted with her personal experiences on the U.S., its people, and its culture to offer solutions.

Americans, as Mead sees it, are driven to "advance" from generation to generation, creating a nuclear family that tends to sever itself from origins and extended relations. She uses the term "third generation" to describe the Americans of 1942; not aware of their European roots and striving to out pace prior generations. While this is a characteristic that is a strength for a pioneering spirit, it is one of the major weaknesses of American culture: yearning to tear down the old to make way for the new. One of the best examples of this can be seen in the importing of artisans and mechanizing processes to create what is needed without valuing the time and skill that preceded the end product. Mead also describes the country as overwhelmingly middle class; its people striving for upward mobility and quantifiable success, which is mirrored in the conditional love that parents give their children. America is also a puritan nation, with a belief that they are rewarded for their effort and faith in God. Mead postulates that in order to go to war, Americans need moral justification, even odds, and the knowledge that they did not pick the fight. She describes the American people as industrious and democratically inclined people who work better if they know that there is not a "parent hand" leading the course, something very different from the "streamlined" totalitarian state against which they were fighting. To head these uniquely American cultural characteristics is a key to bolstering strength in war.

By looking at the strengths of the American people for the task of winning a war, Mead is also able to reveal a map for future peace for which she sees Americans are suited as stewards. Mead distinguishes her vision from negotiated armistices, which she describes as a way for struggling nations to regroup and fight another day. She also distances herself from the kind of pacifism that tends to disparage warmongering and its participants with no guide for other options. Mead postulates, based on her own experience as an anthropologist, that war is not an innate characteristic of the human species. Rather it is taken by many as the most efficient way to reach a goal. Mead proposes that nations and individuals all over the planet have recently been caught in the same "net" of human existence; a global society intricately connected. Every culture has something to enrich the whole, and every individual has the right to cultivate what they have in them. Mead proposes that anthropologists, social scientists, and scientists, although currently speaking a somewhat "limited language", can work toward a connected and peaceful society. What is needed is the valuation of each individual and an understanding of our differences, something for which anthropologists are uniquely trained.Through a valuation of all individuals, not just from an ethnocentric perspective, and a respect for the offerings of all individuals, Mead creates a proposal for a sound, although admittedly distant, proposal for global cooperation based on initiative and democratically motivated science.

Citation Information:
Mead, M. (1971). And keep your powder dry: An anthropologist looks at America. Freeport, N.Y.: Books for Libraries Press.

Links:
War Only an Invention